Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan

Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan

Some 15,000 same sex couples have married since the Same Sex Couples Act became law last year, according to figures published this week.  Half were conversions from civil partnerships.

While celebrating that landmark in equalities law we should remember there is unfinished business in the partnership stakes.  A rush to get the Act on the statute books meant related issues got left in the Parliamentary sidings as the Bill progressed through the Commons and the Lords. Humanist marriage was one issue; civil partnerships for opposite-sex couples another.

The latter of these gets an airing in the Commons today with Tim Loughton MP’s 10-Minute Rule Bill which seeks to makes civil partnerships open to all.  I, along with MPs from several other Parties, am a sponsor of the Bill, which sadly will have little chance of becoming law, but will be an opportunity for renewed lobbying.

There was some suspicion during the passage of the Same Sex Marriage Act that the attempt to extend civil partnerships to opposite-sex couples at the same time was a wrecking amendment or sour grapes, despite the support of prominent gay rights activists like Peter Tatchell.  Heterosexuals could already marry, why did they need the ‘lesser’ option of a civil partnership?

Now that same sex marriage is, in very little time, an accepted and successful part of modern British life we need not worry about ulterior motives and can look at the issue of opposite-sex civil partnership on its merits.

There are 2.9 million opposite-sex couples living together that are not married: a number that has doubled since 1996. Preventing these couples from accessing civil partnerships denies them the same protection under the law that is enjoyed by married couples or same-sex couples in civil partnerships. This lack of protection could impact particularly on the children of opposite-sex couples who don’t feel marriage is right for them.

As a lawyer I was often dismayed that cohabiting couples had no idea that even long-standing relationships lacked the protections on separation or death that married couples enjoy.  Many such couples do not want to marry but would like the economic security that a civil partnership could provide.

Hopefully, the Government will respond favourably to Tim Loughton’s Bill and take up the legislation, but there is no current likelihood of that.

Therefore, two of my constituents, Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan, are pursuing a judicial review calling on the Government to open up civil partnerships to opposite-sex couples, on the grounds that the current legislation is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Permission has been granted and the full hearing will take place on 19 & 20 January 2016.

Rebecca, Charles and alI the MPs supporting opposite-sex civil partnerships are very grateful to Ava Lee and Fiona Miller of the Equal Civil Partnerships Campaign for their crusading work on the issue.

If you want to show your support, please contact  or tweet to @EqualCPs using #EqualLove.

Profile photo of Andy Slaughter About Andy Slaughter
Andy Slaughter MP is the Labour MP for Hammersmith and Shadow Justice Minister

Print Friendly


  • Christopher Lennon October 21, 2015 10:52 am

    What is the difference between a civil (registry office) wedding and a civil partnership, for a heterosexual couple?

  • Ken October 22, 2015 6:45 pm

    Whilst I agree that the civil partnership act should be extended to include opposite sex couples, do you think that many would take up this alternative form of union? What would be the reasons behind it when a civil partnership bestows many of the same rights and obligations as marriage?

    • Alan Hearn November 22, 2015 1:29 pm

      My (female) partner of 22 years and I will jump on the chance the second we become a truly EQUAL country, not just a P.C. one! We’re both divorced, and where marriage is concerned: been there, done that, burnt the T-shirt and found the experience so toxic we’ll never go near it again, but we think it only fair our different genitals do not exempt us from the Civil Partnership protections, which would also protect us from British Government only recognising us as a couple when it suits THEM.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to toolbar